<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Candy Slice of Life &#187; Arkin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://candyslice.com/tag/arkin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://candyslice.com</link>
	<description>A Sweet Little Conservative Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:45:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Is Arkin really The Amazing Larry?</title>
		<link>http://candyslice.com/2007/02/is-arkin-really-the-amazing-larry/</link>
		<comments>http://candyslice.com/2007/02/is-arkin-really-the-amazing-larry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Are you kidding me?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyslice.wordpress.com/2007/02/02/is-arkin-really-the-amazing-larry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karl from Leaning Straight Up, hips us to a little time switcharoo at William Arkin&#8217;s blog. The post that appeared mysteriously this morning, now has a new timestamp. Instead of 5:31 AM 02/01/07 &#8211; It is now 5:31 PM. Amazing &#8211; and now all is right with the world. Come to think of it, there…]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="amazinglarry-1.jpg" href="http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2005/09/13/PH2005091300716.gif"><img src="http://candysliceoflife.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/amazinglarry-1.thumbnail.jpg" border="0" alt="Amazing Larry from Pee Wee's Big Adventure!" hspace="6" vspace="6" align="right" /></a>Karl from <a href="http://leaningstraightup.com/2007/02/02/the-magic-continues-arkins-new-post-is-now-dated-531pm/">Leaning Straight Up</a>, hips us to a little time switcharoo at William Arkin&#8217;s blog.  The post that <a href="http://candysliceoflife.com/2007/02/02/mystery-post-of-william-arkin/">appeared mysteriously this morning</a>, now has a new timestamp.  Instead of 5:31 AM 02/01/07 &#8211; It is now 5:31 PM.  Amazing &#8211; and now all is right with the world.</p>
<p>Come to think of it, there is a resemblance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://candyslice.com/2007/02/is-arkin-really-the-amazing-larry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mystery post of William Arkin</title>
		<link>http://candyslice.com/2007/02/mystery-post-of-william-arkin/</link>
		<comments>http://candyslice.com/2007/02/mystery-post-of-william-arkin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Are you kidding me?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyslice.wordpress.com/2007/02/02/mystery-post-of-william-arkin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where did that come from? The Arrogant and Intolerant Speak Out A Note to My Readers on Supporting the Troops New Middle East Commander Correctly Stays in His Lane See that post tucked in the middle &#8211; it wasn&#8217;t there yesterday. In fact, The Arrogant and Intolerant Speak Out, only appeared on his side bar…]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did that come from?</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/earlywarning/2007/02/the_arrogant_and_intolerant_sp.html">The Arrogant and Intolerant Speak Out</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/earlywarning/2007/02/post_11.html">A Note to My Readers on Supporting the Troops</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/earlywarning/2007/01/new_middle_east_commander_corr.html">New Middle East Commander Correctly Stays in His Lane<br />
</a><br />
See that post tucked in the middle &#8211; it wasn&#8217;t there yesterday.  In fact, <em>The Arrogant and Intolerant Speak Out</em>, only appeared on his side bar on the front page for a short time yesterday and the post itself was on the front page for a very short time.</p>
<p>I popped over there today and see the Arrogant post along with this new mystery post <em>A Note to my Readers on Supporting the Troops</em>.   And the timestamps make it VERY interesting.</p>
<p>Arrogant timestamp:  Posted at 09:39 AM ET, 02/ 1/2007<br />
Note to my Readers timestamp:  Posted at 05:31 AM ET, 02/ 1/2007</p>
<p>First comment under <em>Note to my Readers</em>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="commentText">You&#8217;re a jerk, Arkin.</p>
<p class="posted">Posted by: Matt | February  1, 2007 05:47 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="posted">First comment under <em>Arrogant</em>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="commentText">Being subjected to such things isn&#8217;t fun, is it?&#8230;</p>
<p class="commentText">{snipped}</p>
<p>&#8230;Keep in mind how all your words affect them, not just the ones you direct at them.</p>
<p class="posted">Posted by: Matt | February  1, 2007 04:08 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="posted">Now, it&#8217;s not so much that the timestamp of the comment on <em>Arrogant</em> comes before that of the <em>Note to my Readers</em> first comment &#8211; it&#8217;s the question of where are all the comments that were there before 4:08 PM yesterday for <em>Arrogant </em>and why were they removed?  Is it because they want us to think that the &#8220;apologetic&#8221; <em>Note to my Readers</em> came first?</p>
<p class="posted"><a href="http://leaningstraightup.com/2007/02/02/william-arkin-inserts-some-slightly-more-moderate-comments/">Leaning Straight Up</a> analyzes the apology more closely.</p>
<p class="posted"><a href="http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006811.htm">Poetry at Michelle Malkin&#8217;s blog. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://candyslice.com/2007/02/mystery-post-of-william-arkin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

